Cuban energy nuclear people power program
Operational problems can always arise, but we have not had any major accidents. One of the things that are required to entities that possess radioactive sources is to have an emergency plan, called Plan for Disaster Reduction.
In fact, you have to anticipate and respond to all situations, both technological origin and natural origin. In , Cuba signed the programmatic framework with the IAEA with its priorities: health, food security and the environment.
These priorities will target projects in the country with the international body until In the interest aroused at international level, food safety should be one of the new directions to be taken by Cuba in the field of nuclear energy. This device today has the ability to meet domestic demand, and it would be necessary to import more infrastructures to enable mass risk study of food.
Another application of nuclear energy does not already own conditions to benefit a majority sector of the country are the analysis of environmental pollution.
Studies to determine the cleanliness of water resources are made using nuclear techniques currently very restricted to specific laboratories. The Havana Bay has been one of those investigations, which required to be extended to many other Cubans environments. What collaborative projects does Cuba maintain with other countries on issues of nuclear energy?
But collaborations we have more participation are regionally. This link is that in that country they rescued a similar plant that we have. The project was presented and accepted within the framework of the Joint Commission Cuba-Vietnam. One of the big questions concerning growth of the Cuban nuclear energy is the relationship with the United States.
From to date, researchers and Cuban leaders have been unable to participate in events of the IAEA when these are done on American soil. From the turn of gradually implemented in relations between the two countries, how will again be possible such exchanges?
In the near future, these topics will be included, ultimately, in the negotiating table? The conversation here is moderated according to OnCuba News discussion guidelines.
Please read the Comment Policy before joining the discussion. Your email address will not be published. All Rights Reserved. Home Cuba Society Cuban History. March 7, The Nuclear Central that was not Perhaps the most legendary memory Cubans have on uses of nuclear energy was one that did not materialize. Related Posts. The Cuban woman who revolutionized the study of apes in the world June 12, We were also record holders in terms of devils January 19, When Yarini was killed December 7, The Sans Souci and the artists October 2, Liliam Marrero Santana.
Next Post. Most Read. The completion or lhe first of two Soviet-supplied nuclear reactors at Juragua will probably slip to45 because of construction and supply problems,. Webout tbe quality of the coastrocikm and more serious concerns about the ability of tbe Cubans to maintain and safely operate tbe facility over the longer term. Nonetheless, these reactors have adequate containment structures, and we believe that an accidentassive release of radioactive material Is unlikely.
The Soviets are likely to reject stopping construction of the Juragua plant, but they might be willing to slow construction to allow safety Inspections. It Is unlikely that the Cubans could complete the Juragua reactors without Soviet assistance, but if they managed to arrange for new suppliers and advisers from other countries andakeshift facility, the prospecterious accident would substantially Increase. We do aot believe the Soviet-supplied reactorsuclear weapons proliferation threat.
Castro is firmly committed to completing the two nuclear power reactors under construction at the Juragua nuclear power plant near Oenfuegos.
We believe that tbe basic reactor design is sound. Tbe reactors are similar tothereactors that have been operating successfully in the Soviet Union, Finland, and East Europebe Cuban reactorsundam. They meet Soviet safety standards, though they would not fully satisfy standards enforced in tbe United States and West Europe.
Aboutoercent of the work on the first reactor complex bas been done, but even at the present rate of construction it will not be completed before the ende believe, moreover, that the completion daterobably slip to45 because of cortstruction problems, as well as more assertive enforcement of safety itaridards by Cuban officials.
In addition, construction will probably be slowed by delays in shipments of parts and materials from tbe USSResult of the economic and other problems there. Although large numbers of Cubans have received nuclear-related fraining in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, and. Nuclear facilities require constant equipment checkout and preventive maintenance. Tbe Soviets are committed to completing construction at Juragua.
Moscow is still protective of its relationship with Havana and is likely to reject ending its nuclear cooperation with Cuba or its construction of the plant.
Soviet leaden hope to export to other countries nuclear power plants based on the Cuban model and have consistently defended the safety of the reactors under construction. They emphasize that Soviet experts are training tbe Cubans to operate tbe facility and will oversee the start-up, testing, and adjustment periods. They also plan to provide technical supervision to the Cubans for two years after start-up. Because of recently revived international concerns about the safety of the Cuban reactors and sensitivities about Chernobyl, however, Moscow may agree to press Havana to purchase Western technology some of which is protected by COCOM controls to improve the safety of the Juragua facility.
In return, Soviet officials may expectStates to enter into athe Castro regime about tbe safetyreactors. They would hope thatwouldeneral thawrelations and possiblyUS certification of the safety of. Soviet leaden may agree to deliberately slow down construction and allow an inlernational safety inspection, thus pushing the completion date into the mid-or. This would be more likely if Cuba's Caribbean and Latin American neighbors and the United States expressed strong concerns about the safety of the plant.
Soviet officials Insist that tbe reactor is safe, however, and would not agree toengthy list of safety concerns. Furthermore, we believe that on-site inspection of construction problems by objective outside observers would require as manyechnicians and expertseriod of six toonths. If the Soviet Union terminated its support for the construction of the Juragua plant, the Castro regime would be very bard pressed to finish it.
It would require advanced technology from countries with nuclear power programs. Oechoslovakla is tbe best alternativeechnical standpoint, although Finland also could provide some technical assistance.
Neither country would be likely to help the Cubans for political reasons. Even if willing, both countries probably would insist on being paid in hard currency-which Havana could not afford.
0コメント